resistance is fertile

living underground in the real world

old soul song (for the new world order) December 31, 2008

The world is so old and sad today, isn’t it? Gaza and Iraq and the GOP. And this. And here on my beloved little chunk of the Pacific everything seems to be shutting down. Chain stores are going in where all the weird locally-owned places used to be. We were walking past a shuttered shop the other day: “Paintings by the Sea with Antoinette” or something like that. One look in the dirty windows told you that it wasn’t exactly the most professional shop, but it was a homemade kind of place, and it just got to me. Jacob said “But did Kauai really need a shop like that?”

No, Kauai certainly didn’t need it, but it seems to me that the edge between what we need and what we don’t seem to actually need, but which fills up what people call our souls, is the edge where we should be living. That spot somewhere between bread and water and light and color. Our souls, for lack of a better term, are dying in this mean lowdown capitalist world.

Which reminds me of a pep talk I’ve been meaning to give myself:

Women of the world (and the good dudes, too)!

Whist raging against the dying of the light for yet another year, remember this:

When your entire life is a project, a continually exploding burst of rocketfire continually remaking the way of living in the world, people are going to not understand what you’re doing. They are going to —often unintentionally, it sometimes helps to remember that (it sometimes doesn’t)—hate on you.

The other day some dude put me and my little micro business down, put down, in fact, my entire sort of gestalt, and I hid how much it had bothered me for three days. Then I started talking about it, and Jacob pointed out that there was another way to see the insult, that it could have been a critique of the rest of the world, and a compliment to me, in a certain way. The potential insulter had told me that the large chocolate corporations waste more chocolate in a day than I use in a year, basically, and I interpreted it was a way of putting down my tiny little business. Jacob pointed out that this person could have been saying how shameful it was that big choco companies waste so much of such a precious commodity, and how I am part of a positive tide in the opposite direction, or something like that.

Anyway, for three days I worked up a little pep talk for times like this:

Women of the world! You have to be rock solid in your beliefs. You have to constantly examine yourself and measure your beliefs against how you understand, as Gandhi said, Truth at that moment. You have to constantly change and grow and learn and be honest.

And once you’ve committed yourself to that road, which is the road of being square with yourself on the deepest level:

fuck everyone else.

Because people are not going to understand you and that your life is a big beautiful messy project and that everything is of a piece and that those pieces have a goal. People are irredeemably stupid and cruel, and they are going to constantly say irredeemably stupid and cruel things to you, mostly out of ignorance, not malice. Most of the time they will not understand that they are being hurtful. So you can be nice to people and be friends with them and learn and grow with them, but in the end you need to pick your people and fuck everyone else.

Speaking of picking your people: that can be hard to do. Here’s a tip. Your people are the ones who get you, who are like you in important ways. My friend S. once said the best thing to me about relationships. She was telling me about how her partner C. annoys her all the time: the way she squeezes the toothpaste irritates her, the way she does the dishes. Basically everything she does around the house annoys her—the way she lives. Even her haircuts and her clothes. But one day she realized that those were all small things, and that they had all the big things in common. Their big overarching beliefs about how the world works and how it should work, their goals, where their hearts were, how they loved loving and caring for each other. They don’t fight about the toothpaste tube these days—they each have their own toothpaste. They get each other, and because of that they can overlook all the small stuff—they know that it is small stuff. Your people are the people like that. You’re lucky when you find them, and you need to hold onto them.

I’ve been aching to write letters to friends lately. I’m too impatient and there is always something outsidey to do and in the end I hope they are all just reading this here blog because at its root it’s a love letter to my kind of people —this is my world. I adore it and I adore you, and I’m so happy you’re there.

Here’s to a year of revolution, transformation, confidence and not giving a shit what other people say about us!

fight

 

white pepper ice cream December 30, 2008

Filed under: cooking is vegan (of course) — lagusta @ 4:54 pm

I love that Cibo Matto song!

icecreamhawaii

Not white pepper, but vegan and amazing coconut, lilikoi (passionfruit) and mango sorbets

OK, I loathe loathe loathe the quote unquote memes that many blogs take part in, whereby someone starts some silly questionnaire or something and “passes” it to another blog to fill out. They seem to be a super waste of time. BUT! I saw this list on a now-forgotten blog (you’re supposed to bold the foods you’ve eaten) and have to very annoyingly point out that I have eaten all but three of these foods. One of the three is not actually food (soy curls), the other two I wouldn’t mind trying: S’cheese because I hear it’s an actually halfway decent vegan cheese, and vodka jelly, because I have a recipe saved for it I’ve been meaning to test drive. So here we go:

(more…)

 

monday miscellany: loving food, small stuff, cervixes, new paltz & androgynous women! December 29, 2008

Links for the long holiday downtime!

blanchett

Ideas in Food: blows my mind every single damn day.
Chadzilla: A hotel chef’s experiments with molecular gastronomy.

Photos of My Cervix: for people (not just women!) interested in the Fertility Awareness Method, or just interested in looking at one woman’s cervix throughout one entire cycle, this is a fascinating blog.

My longtime crush Tilda Swinton talking about (not wearing) makeup to the NYT, O swoon!

orlando1

The other night my fellow Hawaii vacationers (Jacob, Jacob’s sister Pohanna and her sweetheart Andy) and I went to see that Benjamin Button movie, and oh dear it was lovely indeed. I was also especially happy to see my two girlcrushes, The Tilda and Cate Blanchett, in one movie—and a good one at that. On the ride home I nattered on about my love for Tilda Swinton in “Orlando” and Cate Blanchett in “I’m Not There” endlessly.

blanchett_not_there_narrowweb__300x4520

And via Readymade, how cute is this: handmade modern furniture in 1:12 scale “made lovingly by hand” by artist Vanessa Tiegs.

And finally:  Oh, New Paltz!
TIME TO RING OUT THE OLD AND SHOE-IN THE NEW

On Tuesday, January 6th, 2009, Mid-Hudson Valley residents will be invited to cast off some of their residual anger at the outgoing presidential administration by participating in a “Shoe-In” at the New Paltz Village Hall on Plattekill Avenue from 7 to 9PM. A life-size cardboard cutout of George W. Bush will be in attendance. We can promise all that this W. will not cut and run, nor will he duck or dodge.

This event will have its serious side as well. Organizers of the event will call on the American President to ask the Iraqi government to drop all charges against Montader Al-Zaidi, the Iraqi journalist who aimed both of his shoes at President Bush in Baghdad a couple of weeks ago. According to the organizer of the event, Pete Healey, “The President himself made light of the incident almost immediately, joking that Al-Zaidi’s shoes appeared to be ‘size 10′. We hope that Mr. Bush won’t take us too seriously either if footwear of other sizes are aimed at his likeness in New Paltz on the 6th”.

Admission is free. Please bring, or wear, your own shoes, or boots, or sneakers, to this event. The New Paltz Village Hall is on Plattekill Avenue, just one block from the downtown intersection of Main and Plattekill, with a Starbucks and a Chase Bank on the corner.


 

Passover favorites? Easter favorites? December 27, 2008

Filed under: cooking is vegan (of course) — lagusta @ 2:00 am

Hello eaters of the world!

sweetpotmeal

One night last year in Hawaii I made this for dinner, and it killed Jacob, Than, and I with its awesomeness—twice-baked Okinawan sweet potatoes with fried carrot curls and scallions. All credit for the awesomeness of this meal goes to my favorite root in the world, Okinawan sweet potatoes—have you ever had these amazing dudes? They are super sweet and ludicrously rich and brilliantly purple, and my mouth is watering right now.

For the first time, I’m planning to offer special Easter and Passover meals in large sizes for my clients this year (like my Thanksgiving meals). Being a godless super secular Jew I don’t have much experience with either of these meals, so I thought I’d turn to the power of the vegan internet—what are your favorite springtime holiday feast dishes? Please share your thoughts!

I’m not so into a seitan stew, a weird faux lamb or ham thing, or a kugel (unless you can point me to an amazing recipe!), but other than that I’m open to anything.

Here’s what I have so far:

Mushroom lasagna with homemade pasta, mushroom veloute sauce, spinach, and sautéed house-made super thin tempeh

Tzimmes (glazed carrot coins) with lemon slivers

Haroseth (special Passover dried fruit and nut condiment)

Stuffed cabbage rolls with sauerkraut and apples and creamy dill sauce

Apple, dried cherry, and walnut salad with maple dressing

Seitan bourguignon with broccoli, peas, and local asparagus

Young beets with almond skordalia sauce

Spring vegetable soup with matzo balls

Chocolate toffee matzo candy

Dark chocolate bunnies

Strawberry pie

And….that’s a start!

Ideas?

 

truffle movie! December 25, 2008

Veronica had the idea to make a movie of the truffle-making process to show people how crazily labor-intensive it is—so we did! Check it out (and die of cuteness, if I do say so myself!):


Lagusta’s Luscious Truffle Fabrication from lagusta’s luscious on Vimeo.

 

the 60s-worshipping feminist clotheshorse and the midcentury modern fetishist watch Mad Men December 25, 2008

Filed under: culture and its discontents — lagusta @ 3:43 pm

atla-082208-cm01

Jacob’s wet dream: this in our dining room

Her: Look at those boobs!!! They truly bring new meaning to the phrase “defy gravity.”

Him: Look at that credenza. I think it’s a Heywood Wakefield.

hair

My wet dream: this hair, on my head.

Her: Wait—is she—I think she is. She is wearing high-heeled bedroom slippers.

Him: Holy shit I love Futura. And all the fonts on the show.

20081008_draper_146x97

Her: Holy shit I love her hair.

Him: Wow, that’s a beautiful door.

Her: I think that corset is allowing her to pull off the heretofore physically impossible task of making her waist smaller than her neck.

Him: Can you imagine working in that office? The chairs, the desks, the—-is that a Rothko on the wall behind them??

Her: Can you imagine wearing that many undergarments?

Her: What I wouldn’t give for that coat.

Him: What I wouldn’t give for that lamp. And that chair.

wow

 

from the ground up December 24, 2008

dscf1364found on the beach today!

I’m writing up a series of candidate’s questionnaires for the New Paltz Greens to help us decide whether to endorse non-Green candidates. It’s pretty fascinating, and it’s stretching my brain in all kinds of ways. Based on a suggestion from a fellow Green, I just added this question:

“If elected, would you work to stop the common practice of municipal vehicle idling?”

And my heart just sang for a moment. Talk about building a new and better world, brick by brick—we are doing it! We’re thinking about everything—condoms in schools, Town and Village unification, expanded paper recycling, healthy school lunches, beavers, everything.

It feels good.

Then today on the beach I read the Naomi Klein New Yorker profile and, true to my chosen socioeconopolitico demographic, I adored it and adore her more than ever.

lovefornaomi

And! How perfectly does this passage fit in with what I was just saying a few days ago? It’s pretty much everything I believe about Obama and the left and life in one tidy paragraph:

Both Klein and Lewis [her kickass husband] are skeptical about Barack Obama. “I’ve been at rallies and seen him speak, and I feel that feeling that one feels,” Lewis says. “It is thrilling. And it’s churlish not to allow yourself to be thrilled. We crave inspiration, and it’s a bleak life to always be dissecting things. But the main feeling that Obama creates in me is fear, because I see people fooling themselves. If you actually look at his policies, what they reflect is the triumph of the right-wing political paradigm since Reagan, and I think he could set things back dramatically, because for young people who are getting engaged in politics for the first time, for them to be disillusioned is very, very damaging.” Because Klein doesn’t expect much from any politician, she doesn’t spend time wishing Obama were more progressive. “I don’t want to appear too cynical, but when I first saw the ‘Yes We Can’ rock video that Will.I.Am made, my first response was ‘Wow, finally a politician is making ads that are as good as Nike’s,’ ” she says. “The ‘Yes We Can’ slogan means whatever you want it to mean. It’s very ‘Just Do It.’ When you hear it, you catch yourself thinking, Yeah! We’re gonna end torture and shut down Guantánamo and get out of Iraq! And then you think, Wait a minute, is he really saying that? He’s not really saying that, is he? He’s saying we’re going to send more troops to Afghanistan. He’s telling regular people what they want to hear, and then in the back rooms he’s making deals and signing on to the status quo. But if people don’t like where Obama is they should move the center.” To this end, Klein has been taking every opportunity to call for the nationalization of the oil companies. “It’s the job of the left to move the center,” she says. “Get out there and say some crazy stuff! And then, suddenly, it’ll seem more reasonable for politicians to take riskier positions.” (emphasis mine)

FUCKING A!

dscf1360

 

oh holy fucking shit i love Whispertown 2000 December 23, 2008

swimtest3

Somehow one of my most favoritest bands in the world released an album and I totally missed it. Like a birthday present I didn’t know was coming, a friend who had worked on the CD handed it to me a few weeks ago in LA and asked if I already had it.

The Whispertown 2000 (I heard a rumor that they were once Vagtown 2000, which, come on people, doesn’t that automatically make them your favorite band of all time right there?) — your new favorite band you’ve never heard of, and you can trust my love for them because I have never met them.

Because my partner works in the music business, I mostly listen to bands we know, which is usually a friendly pleasure. But just like movies made of beloved books, it does take away some of the imagination factor. I don’t want to imagine exactly who Jenny Lewis or Conor O are singing their super confessional songs about—of course, I know that sometimes their songs are completely made up and lots of artistic license is taken, but the wonderings do creep in every once in a while. I want my favorite music to be wholly mine, to make up stories behind the songs and about the people playing and writing them. Thus, Whispertown has been a double pleasure for the past few years—a great band I know of but do not actually know!

The lead singer Morgan’s voice has the cuteness (not too cute though, I promise you: merely cute, not cutsey) of early Rilo Kiley and a lot of the quirkiness of my other most favoritest band ever, The Blow. Morgan’s songs are strange and old timey and jangly in all the right places and LA-bizarre, all at once. Enjoy!

 

godpeeps be up in my biz December 23, 2008

img_0187

Oh dear, I am having fun with this.

I don’t have the heart to tell this dude that he is using “meme” wrong, because if you already believe in all the shit he believes in, any amount of knowledge dropped on you at all might just make you keel over, you know? And also: how sad would your life be if you had a blog devoted to how shitty things are? I know my blog dips into those waters once in a while, but I also revel in the joy that moving through the world as a godless faux-lesbian vegan chef anarchist jew affords me. Fuck yeah!

(Full disclosure: I know this dude will find this post through the magic of the blogosphere, and I just can’t help throwing in just about every triggery word I can think of.)

 

on human perfectability, or: should I step down as the New Paltz Green Party chairwoman? December 20, 2008

(I wrote this on the plane to Hawaii last week)

drawgreflection

I just got around to reading the November 17 love-letter-to-Obama New Yorker, and there is just nothing snarky I can say about it—what a beautiful issue. (The entire thing is available online, too.)

Well, OK. Obviously, it’s beautiful as a fantasy document, since all of us who were warning that Obama wasn’t our savior months ago are, sadly, being proven ever more right by the day, but I’m not going to get into that. It’s a very earnest issue written by optimistic, good-hearted, earnest people, and in that sense it was beautiful to read.

As we all know, and as the brilliant ZP makes clear, the New Yorker is dependably liberal and never radical. I know this, and I enjoy what I can and leave the rest. Obama winning was a real victory because of who people thought he was. The fact that he never was that person is almost incidental—or, will be until January 20th, 2009.

I was fascinated by the pair of pieces comparing Obama’s winning strategy and McCain’s losing one—what a great crash course in how to (and how not to) run a campaign. I’m saving the issue to refer to when working on the little local races I am sometimes involved in.

But the most instructive piece for my political life was “The Joshua Generation: Race and the campaign of Barack Obama,” all about Obama’s very reasoned and self-conscious journey to where he is now. It was saddening because David Remnick very plausibly argues that no one except milquetoast Obama-esque politicians could have achieved what he did—I don’t think Remnick finds that saddening, though. I think he is awed by Obama’s even temper and willingness to consciously step out of the “angry black man” mold. As these are the very qualities that leave me less than thrilled about him, the piece confirmed what I already felt in a disheartening way.

Remnick smartly compares and contrasts Obama and Jeremiah Wright, and of course I am on the side of Wright. We are flying over Spokane right now, and ever since Billings I have been staring out the window, thinking about this passage:

Wright saw himself as—and Obama understood him to be—an inheritor of the prophetic tradition, not an accommodationist, and hardly a politician. His jeremiads were meant to rouse, to accuse, to shake off dejection. At times, he called on the familiar metaphor of American blacks as modern-day equivalents of the ancient Hebrews, a people marked by terrible suffering and displacement. Wright was part of a tradition well known to millions of churchgoing African-Americans. But that would never be explained adequately on cable television.

YES. I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about my place on the political spectrum lately, and this passage literally made my heart pound: I don’t want to be Obama. I don’t particularly want to be calm and collected and bring moderates around to my way to thinking with beautiful rhetoric. I want to be the uncompromising voice of hardcore liberalism helping to keep the left left when people like Hillary come along. I don’t want to be Obama—I want to be Jeremiah Wright.

I want to inspire with my belief system, not my ability to unite people. I want to inspire people to change and, to be blunt, be better than they are. I’m not saying that I am perfect–of course, I am far, far from it. But I am obsessed with the idea of perfectibility–continued struggle toward the perfectibility of the individual and collective self is what interests me.

Not: what can we get done? But: how can we be better?

It seems to me that when we are continually striving to be better in all aspects of our lives we will automatically get a lot done.

This is especially relevant to my life right now because last May I had the honor of being elected chairwoman of the New Paltz Green Party. This position has made me think a lot about different types of activism, and how a third party in a tiny town can be maximally efficient. I get way, way too angry way, way too often when I should be acting as a better representative for the Greens (see here [scroll down], here & here), and lately Jacob and I have been having productive and heated talks (my favorite kind!) about how I can be a better Green.

He keeps telling me that it boils down to learning a more appropriate way to interact with people that wins them over to my side, and I keep telling him that it boils down to people not being so incredibly fucking stupid. We go back and forth with this for a while, and eventually I admit that one way to work for the latter is to work on the former, and we come to the same conclusion: the very whisper of the idea of being a politician fills me with intense, skin-crawly loathing for humanity. As a representative of the Green Party, it’s pretty much my job to be nice to everyone and try to get them to be Greens—to be a Green booster. But I just can’t talk to people I disagree with on major issues like that—if you’re not a Green, what can I say to you? You’re obviously either truly evil (and thus a Republican) or a mediocre wishy-washy Democrat, and in either case my life is really too short to bother with you at all. (Most of my friends are Independents, Greens, or we-don’t-talk-to-Lagusta-about-things-like that.)

It’s the same problem most long-time vegetarians I know have talking to non-vegetarians about vegetarianism: most of us avoid it because it’s so blindingly obvious that eating tortured rotting flesh is a ridiculous, outdated idea. Most of us came to that conclusion when we were about twelve, and when you’re thirty and are still dithering about it and doing silly things like eating “humane meat” (HA!!!!!!) there is really nothing to be said.

Believe it or not, I like being this way. And thus the problem. I like having beliefs and standing up for them and admitting that I came to them by thinking about them and if your beliefs are radically different you probably didn’t think that hard. It’s not that I’m very smart, it’s that I know how to listen to my heart. What’s wrong with being right? I still have space in my life for, say, vegetarians who are not vegan. I like to talk with friends about political differences, because my friends are my friends because they are smart and have good hearts, so I will listen to them even if we disagree on minor points—I haven’t totally closed myself off to the world, just, well, mostly.

But it’s not good to be this way and be the head of the Green Party. I don’t want to be a politican—I want to be the Karl Rove of the left, to be honest. I want to be behind the scenes, the mastermind, never emerging to show my inflamed heart to the world because I am just not acceptable to mainstream people. I don’t want to play the dirty tricks Karl Rove does, of course, I just want to indulge in the sense that I get from him: that he is the moral center of the party, an uncompromising figure the politicians on his side listen to. Of course, he is a terrible human being, unlike me. But he’s effective, and he doesn’t seem to compromise.

So here is the question, the one I always come back to whenever I feel like this and the one that never gets resolved: should I work on changing, or revel in who I am? Working on changing would entail learning to suppress my bouts of wonderful, searing manic righteousness—a practically hysterical edge I love to live on, where I get lots done and make lots of people angry. Am I truly productive when I give in to my ultra-passionate, furious side? I like to pretend that I inspire people by example. I like to bloviate on and on about how it’s important to not compromise, that we can’t all be family-friendly and tone down our hardcore lefty positions so Hillary-esque idiots join our side. I like to scream about how me being steadfastly on my side pulls the entire left a bit more to me. But I know this probably turns more people off than it turns on. But it’s so fun!

If I don’t resolve to change, I will not seek another term as head of the Green Party. I’m not sure that I would get elected, because I know there is a faction who think my anger and actions are hurting the party. I can still do just as much good work with the party without being the chair, and if I am not going to change I don’t think it’s appropriate that I am the chair.

Right at this moment we are flying off the coast of the United States, just north of the pretty little town of Eugene Oregon. Goodbye, mainland! It seems like a good time to be thinking about meta questions like this.

My most deeply felt, most passionate and beloved impulses—the things that make me me as I understand myself—are often ineffective and hurtful. What do you do when you realize that, and when you have no idea how not to be you?

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers